首页 体育正文

新加坡博彩公司(www.99cx.vip)_Judge delays decision on Latif corruption charges

admin 体育 2022-06-27 18 0

新加《jia》坡博「bo」彩公司{si}www.99cx.vip)是一个开放皇冠体育“yu”网 wang[址代理『li』APP下载、皇冠体育〖yu〗网址会员APP下载、皇 huang[冠体育『yu』网址【zhi】线路APP下载、皇冠体〖ti〗育网址登录APP下载的官方平台。新加【jia】坡博彩公司上「shang」最新新《xin》加坡博彩〖cai〗公司(si)登录线路、新加(jia)坡博彩‘cai’公司代理“li”网《wang》址更新最快。新〖xin〗加坡博‘bo’彩公「gong」司【si】开放皇冠官方会员注册、皇冠『guan』官方‘fang’代“dai”理『li』开《kai》户{hu}等 deng[业务『wu』。

,

THE Sessions Court in Johor Baru today postponed decision on the case against former Johor executive councillor Abd Latif Bandi, his son, and a real estate consultant, who are facing 37 charges of corruption and money laundering over RM35.7 million.

Judge Kamarudin Kamsun, who was scheduled to deliver the verdict today, said there were still some arguments that needed to be submitted by parties involved and he would then rule on August 7.

“I need to listen to those arguments before making a decision. So, I can’t do it today, hence, a new date will be set,” he said.

Lawyer Salehuddin Saidin, represented Latif, 56, and his son, Ahmad Fauzan Hatim, 30, then applied for the court to hear the submission by the defence.

During the proceedings, the court heard submissions by the prosecution, represented by Deputy Director I, legal and prosecution division of the Malaysian Anti -Corruption Commission (MACC) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, and assisted by deputy public prosecutors Ahmad Akram Gharib and Mahadi Abdul Jumaat.

On June 14, 2017, Latif, Ahmad Fauzan and Amir Shariffuddin Abd Raub, 49, were charged with 33 counts of corruption and four counts of money laundering for a total of RM35.7 million, and they pleaded not guilty to all charges.

On April 21, 2019, Kamarudin acquitted and discharged the three of them of the 37 charges after finding the prosecution having failed to prove its case.

However, on November 7, 2021, the High Court ordered the former chairman of the state housing and local government committee and his co-defendants to enter their defence, after it overturned the Sessions Court verdict.

On the corruption charges, the three men are charged under section 28 (1) (C) of the MACC Act 2009, read together with section 16 (a) (B) of the same act.

They were also charged under section 32 (8) (c) and section 89 of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti -Terrori *** Financing and Proceeds from Unlawful Activities (AMLA) Act 2001. – Bernama, June 26, 2022.


转《zhuan》载说明:本文「wen」转〖zhuan〗载自Sunbet。
版权声明

本文仅代表作者观点,
不代表本站Allbet欧博官网的立场。
本文系作者授权发表,未经许可,不得转载。

评论